tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1832926211874008675.post5209057914351045376..comments2023-06-26T23:01:49.436+10:00Comments on Batsy Cricket: Peter, Peter, PeterBatsyhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/04325475301434404114noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1832926211874008675.post-68929401128110730652011-11-15T09:26:22.217+11:002011-11-15T09:26:22.217+11:00Dear Stephen,
I'm sorry, I can see how that ca...Dear Stephen,<br />I'm sorry, I can see how that came across as an attack on your judgement, but it was much more about the choice to use those words yesterday - made by Malcolm Knox - than that anyone would ever say them, and I'll amend that. I understand that comments take on a different hue in the light of events and when removed from their original context. I also understand in Batsyhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04325475301434404114noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1832926211874008675.post-79261229509692200332011-11-15T08:24:23.522+11:002011-11-15T08:24:23.522+11:00Oh dear. I do remember the conversation in which I...Oh dear. I do remember the conversation in which I spoke about Peter Roebuck, but I think the quotation attributed to me is a simplification of what I said. I was trying to make the point that, in the mix of his personality, he had great abilities, the sort of attributes that are necessary to be a judge or a political leader. I was not suggesting that, taken as a whole personality, he would have Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com